![]() ![]() The MXL 770 features a pronounced bump in the high end, making it a bright mic. This range is suitable for using these mics for basically any type of voice.Īlso, this range allows the user to record a plethora of sources, from acoustic guitar to percussion instruments, all the way to ukulele and mandolin. This ensures that both mics capture the source accurately without adding unwanted noises or artifacts.īoth mics are listed as having a frequency response that goes from 20 Hz to 20 kHz. Both the MXL 770 and the MXL 990 are also connected via XLR cable.Īnother aspect in common is their self-noise of 20 dB, which is relatively low. Phantom power is usually supplied by any interface currently on the market. ![]() In typical condenser mic fashion, both of these models need 48V phantom power in order to function. Similarly, as condensers mics, both are ideal for picking up details and nuances that a standard dynamic microphone is not capable of capturing.īoth the MXL 770 and the MXL 990 are good choices for the home studio, particularly if used in common applications such as voice and acoustic guitar recording. For instance, both feature a cardioid polar pattern, which is excellent for picking up the source in front of the mic and rejecting noise from the sides and back. This includes recording several sources as well as voice-over work, podcasting, broadcasting, and high-quality audio in general. They are both great for musicians looking to get started with recording.īoth mics are quite affordable and will do well in a home studio recording setup. It’s more versatile, sounds cleaner and less muddy, and I’m sure if we recorded something in or above the 15 kHz range, it would be a little more tame vs the 990.Both the MXL 770 and MXL 990 are in the same category and are solid choices for a budget condenser microphones. My thoughts are that the 770 is the better-sounding mic (for vocals at least). The treble roll-off in the 770’s response curve from MXL is definitely steeper, so the evidence for this is twofold. I could see this making a big difference with high-pitched sounds. The 990 has a few peaks in the 15 kHz range and generally higher gain above that. But when we look at the spectral data, it’s clear to see why this is the general consensus. ![]() The claims that the the 990 has a “harsh” or “shrill” treble sound are hard to stand behind by just listening to the recordings. The 990 also sounds slightly muddy, which is confirmed by higher peaks in the bass region. ![]() Vocals definitely sound brighter on the 770. Looking at the spectral data for the spoken audio, it’s plain to see that the 770 has a much more prominent peak at 10 kHz. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |